News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Major book publishers sue Amazon’s Audible over new speec... by gamblor956 on Monday August 26, 2019 @04:40PM (#20803537)
This analogy doesn't work, because different laws apply to physical goods.

You're allowed to physically do whatever you want to the copy of a book you've purchased. You can fold it, you can tear it, you can burn it. Hell, you can even eat it if you really want.

I can also scan the pages and print them into a new softback. I can even just retype the story and print it into a new softback.

(The quote is from the parent's comment, not the one I directly replied to but my reply fits here better.) This is not permissible under copyright law, and never has been. That would be creating a new copy, which is exactly what copyright law was created to prevent.

Re:Major book publishers sue Amazon’s Audible over new speec... by SkyBelow on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @07:43AM (#20808516)
>(The quote is from the parent's comment, not the one I directly replied to but my reply fits here better.) This is not permissible under copyright law, and never has been. That would be creating a new copy, which is exactly what copyright law was created to prevent.

My understanding is that this is entirely legal as long as you don't sell the copy. Borrowing/giving it away would likely be illegal but not worth prosecuting. But a copy solely as a personal backup is allowed. We do that with data all the time.