News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Major book publishers sue Amazon’s Audible over new speec... by alistairSH on Monday August 26, 2019 @08:50AM (#20799408)
The whole publisher intention behind copyright and license rights is that you shouldn't think of digital products any differently than you think of physical products on a shelf.

They don't claim that at all. Digital items are typically licensed, not owned outright (as is the case with a physical book).

That said, the way the market is currently configured, audio books are a separate product from digital text. That's fine and legal. But, we don't have to like it. I have a legally blind* family member and it always feels a bit like a scam when she has to repurchase books that somebody else in the family already purchased.

* She can see, barely. For complex texts (particularly textbooks), she prefers to have an audio copy as well as the printed/digital text.

Re:Major book publishers sue Amazon’s Audible over new speec... by saltminer on Monday August 26, 2019 @12:50PM (#20801396)
>Digital items are typically licensed, not owned outright (as is the case with a physical book).

You own an MP3 in the same way you own a book. If you email an MP3 to others in exchange for payment, the FBI aren't going to bust down your friends' doors and securely erase the files from their drives, it's up to the licensor to sue you for damages. Likewise, if you copy books and start selling them at the flea market, nobody's going to round up and destroy the unlicensed copies, it's up to the publisher to destroy you in court.