News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Major book publishers sue Amazon’s Audible over new speec... by ghaff on Monday August 26, 2019 @08:44AM (#20799366)
Those don't exactly come across as authoritative sources. Show me some specific case law and I might start to believe it.

IANAL but, at least as a practical matter, anything along these lines that's done for personal/internal use seems likely fair game. Someone is seriously going to make a case that I can't transcribe a copy of a speech or other recording for my own use?

It's external distribution that gets stickier--especially as you get beyond short excerpts to a full and complete work.

ADDED: And, yes, anyone can sue anyone for anything. But arguments that something could technically be construed as a legal violation even though no one has ever been called on it in the history of the legal system aren't terribly convincing.

Re:Major book publishers sue Amazon’s Audible over new speec... by MaxBarraclough on Monday August 26, 2019 @01:33PM (#20801867)
> anything along these lines that's done for personal/internal use seems likely fair game

How about students photocopying books?

Universities seem pretty convinced that's not permitted.

Re:Major book publishers sue Amazon’s Audible over new speec... by SkyBelow on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @07:42AM (#20808506)
It has been some years but I don't remember mine ever having an issue with me copying books I own. They didn't even have an issue with copying books I borrowed, which seems far more suspect.
Re:Major book publishers sue Amazon’s Audible over new speec... by MaxBarraclough on Tuesday August 27, 2019 @06:25PM (#20815053)
This article [0] says that, at least here in the UK, it's permitted to photocopy a chapter, or an article, but it's not OK to photocopy a whole library book, even as a student.

They note however that The concept is not defined in the legislation, so they seem to be going by feel really.

https://www.soas.ac.uk/infocomp/copyright/library/photocopyi...