News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Software Architecture Guide by geofft on Saturday August 24, 2019 @10:53AM (#20787426)
Again, I am not asking how to use UML, or why the inventors of UML designed it in a certain way, or why it sounds like it could be a good idea, or whether there are other systems like UML that are good ideas (I can just use those systems directly then!).

I am asking what evidence there is that UML helps me deliver better products more efficiently. Are there successful software projects that do this complete code generation thing (and how do they compare to directly writing real code in more efficient programming languages with rich typesystems)? Are there development efforts where giving up and deciding that certain architectural elements are hard to change has been the right approach (in my experience it generally never is)? What are their names? Do they have experience reports? Are there numbers?

I am looking for, at the least, a specific name like "The Chrysler Comprehensive Compensation System took these approaches to development." (But hopefully not a massive and expensive failure like C3.)

Re:Software Architecture Guide by streetcat1 on Saturday August 24, 2019 @11:17AM (#20787592)
So you would not find any. You would need to judge those tools based on your specific use cases.

Even if you find such and such project did X and got Y, the sample size is too small.

The issue with software is that each project is different, and hence we cannot generalise from any given project.