Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection

Re:Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection by bgdnyxbjx on Friday August 23, 2019 @03:58PM (#20781953)

On top of the generally absurd claims made in the official Google post, that writing was just terrible. Comma splices all over the place, sentences starting with So and But, very strange tone and wording in some things. Did anyone edit this?

Oh and I love the “thank you in advance for your help” lol what?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection by thetinguy on Friday August 23, 2019 @07:57PM (#20784042)

Starting a sentence with conjunction is not grammatically incorrect. https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/words-to-not-b...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection by bgdnyxbjx on Saturday August 24, 2019 @02:00AM (#20785524)

So you are saying that this was a totally fine way to write? But it sounds very awkward and sloppy to me. Maybe, it’s just me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection by nvrspyx on Saturday August 24, 2019 @02:19PM (#20788751)

I mean, you just used both of the ones that you mentioned in this comment alone, unless that was intentional. I think it sounds fine, so long as the writing is not intended to be super formal.

[ Parent | on HN ]