Consider that JABS directed people to a medical professional researching a link between vaccinations and behavioural changes and that this is what the parents were seeking. More over that had the case studies been properly examined that a causal link would have been demonstrated to be unlikely. How then is JABS culpable?

Or did I miss something?

Even if JABS commissioned the research unless they instructed that fraud should be carried out I don't see the harm they did?