News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WeWork Isn’t a Tech Company by hn_throwaway_99 on Thursday August 22, 2019 @12:14AM (#20764570)
Except AWS does a whole lot more than just let you rent generic EC2 instances by the hour. They have sooo, sooo, sooo many custom services that their lock-in is huge. It would be extremely painful for any sizable customer on AWS to switch (my previous comment on the subject: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20339381).

No such lock-in exists with WeWork. In fact the entire reason for WeWork's existence is it doesn't have lock-in.

Re:WeWork Isn’t a Tech Company by icelancer on Thursday August 22, 2019 @02:22AM (#20765192)
>> No such lock-in exists with WeWork. In fact the entire reason for WeWork's existence is it doesn't have lock-in.

This isn't true for their expanding customer base: Businesses who are paying for blocks of co-working memberships to expand through services rather than finding new leases themselves. There is significant lock-in when this occurs, as people may move close to those WeWork locations, arrange their life around it, etc.

Re:WeWork Isn’t a Tech Company by mtremsal on Friday August 23, 2019 @06:43AM (#20776169)
That's also my understanding of their pitch; have we seen any evidence it's actually happening?
Re:WeWork Isn’t a Tech Company by icelancer on Saturday August 24, 2019 @08:50PM (#20790660)
Anecdotally in Seattle it is absolutely happening. My small business is one of many that is expanding into these short-term spaces due to flexibility. Who knows if it's actually working well, but I've seen many "sub-offices" at the co-working space where I lease two desks for my employees.