Granted - your payout at acquisition didn’t work to your expectations - and it’s typical in SV - but after dust settled you been offered something not that bad in a company that is really not a lagger after all...
Lesson learned?
So it's not bad per say, but it's not valuable at all. Even though it's being sold to you as such.
Someone took a high risk working at a small startup. That risk should be rewarded with something OTHER than a "nice" job offer, which you can get in 1-2 month of interviews anyway.
Fairness lesson learned?
Is there some company that is provably good at acquisations? To my understanding they are always very risky and maybe more than 50% end up failing somehow.
That being said the culture at that startup was the best I've experienced. The people and the product were fantastic. So if I were to do it over again would I have made the same choice? I'm not sure and that caution purely comes from the culture and management of Splunk.
It's unfortunate this is what the landscape has become. On one hand I'm happy for the SignalFX founders to have made it and hit pay dirt. But everyone else... Yeah, they're all going to get swindled on the deal. Sure you'll make some money but not nearly as much as a select few and even then there's a good chance anyone who tries out Splunk internally runs into the same wall myself and a bunch of my peers did. Splunk, Palo Alto Networks, IBM... They're all are done innovating. These companies buy relevancy and then are proud of their accompliments in changing the world. Or that's what they tell their prospects, customers and themselves. So much great technology and brain power are getting locked up in these non-R&D companies who are at a stage of run rate revenue but still think they're a startup that will continue to pull 50% growth YoY. It's absurd.
Splunk isn't good at acquisitions. I've seen it first hand. I'd never go back there willingly. I hope the SignalFX crew ends up better. But at the end of the day you're working at Splunk.