Re:Hundreds of extreme self-citing scientists revealed in ne...
by whymauri on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @05:12PM
(#20752199)
What? These are perfectly valid questions to be asking and do not inherently stop you from researching what you're working on.
I know some scientists that define their research direction by asking these questions first before pursuing an idea. Many great inventions like optogenetics or expansion microscopy came from this investigative strategy. It can help keep your resources and energy in check.
Re:Hundreds of extreme self-citing scientists revealed in ne...
by std_throwaway on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @05:17PM
(#20752271)
Both strategies work to some extent.
Some topics need a large investment to show anything at all.
Some topics show immediate results (good or bad).
Should we, for example, stop all activities in fusion research because so far nobody has shown that it will work and we already invested billions?
Re:Hundreds of extreme self-citing scientists revealed in ne...
by jedberg on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @05:15PM
(#20752241)
I think you’ve misinterpreted what I said. I’m not suggesting everyone is a fool, quite the opposite.
It’s just an important question to ask yourself.
Re:Hundreds of extreme self-citing scientists revealed in ne...
by reallydude on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @05:34PM
(#20752449)
The purpose of PHDs are to move human knowledge forward. You have to do an analysis of something that, in all likelihood, nobody has done before (or not enough to be considered settled).
Imagine how many inventions we would have missed if all inventors had shared your mindset.