News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Calculus Is Deeply Irrational by derefr on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @04:00PM (#20751380)
> So, where are the squares in nature? Hell, where are the circles. Where is the constant curvature.

They exist! The crystal structures of molecules are rather Platonic, for example. Nature is elegant when you get very small, requiring fewer and fewer core concepts as you work your way down to more fundamental levels of understanding. (At lower levels those fundamentals might be irrational ones, but still, those few primitives [like spirals in complex space] become the only tools you need.)

The inelegance, then, comes from modelling the interactions of mind-bogglingly huge collections of these fundamental things, at high levels of abstractions, and then expecting your abstraction (which is just that: a formula that allows you to make some useful prediction of these super-high-level interactions) to be as elegant as the fundamental forces operating at the lowest levels.

Re:Calculus Is Deeply Irrational by geebee on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @04:23PM (#20751662)
very small, or arbitrarily small? ;)
Re:Calculus Is Deeply Irrational by hashmap on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @05:53PM (#20752604)
Very small. I think the resolution of this simulation was set to planck length. The screen door effect is hardly noticeable.