News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Time to Get Serious about Tick-Borne Diseases by tntniceman on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @12:11PM (#20748595)
The desert certainly doesn't stop the suckers, speaking as a New Mexico resident. Ticks abound, Lyme equally so.
Re:Time to Get Serious about Tick-Borne Diseases by 0xffff2 on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @01:10PM (#20749340)
Really? The CDC [0] shows a total of 4 cases of Lyme in NM from 2012-2017. Looking at that map, it appears to me that the desert does seem to stop the suckers.

[0] https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/stats/maps.html

Re:Time to Get Serious about Tick-Borne Diseases by evandev on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @03:13PM (#20750826)
Not to mention:

> Each dot represents one case of Lyme disease and is placed randomly in the patient’s county of residence. The presence of a dot in a state does not necessarily mean that Lyme disease was acquired in that state. People travel between states, and the place of residence is sometimes different from the place where the patient became infected.

Re:Time to Get Serious about Tick-Borne Diseases by planteen on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @06:37PM (#20752925)
95% of cases come from 14 states, none of which are western. Mountain and Pacific (WA, OR, CA, ID, NV, AZ, MT, UT, NM, CO, WY) states together are around 0.6% of lyme cases nationwide. Many people in these states contract the disease out east, come home, and then visit a doctor in a western state. New Mexico had 3 confirmed cases in 2017, out of nearly 30,000 in the entire US. So no, Lynne disease does not even close to equality abound in New Mexico or the West.

https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/datasurveillance/tables-recent.html