Re:Off-Facebook Activity
by high_derivative on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @11:58AM
(#20748426)
Sorry, but my point stands. In Facebook's case, there is absolutely zero reason to assume good intentions, give the benefit of the doubt, have general good-will, or believe its employees regarding privacy aims.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Which social media company would you believe regarding privacy?
Nothing such as absolute trust. It has to be a relative comparison. For me it is Apple, Google, Facebook in that order.
Purism: https://librem.one/
Any social with a monthly fee is not going to hit the same network criticality that makes Facebook reign supreme. Attracting people to a new service is hard enough tell them it'll cost 50$ a year and it's hopeless.
Re:Off-Facebook Activity
by gregknicholson on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @06:44PM
(#20752985)
The network is not the same thing as the provider. Anyone can use Mastodon for free, so Purism is part of a larger network than just Purism.
Any social media company whose business isn't renting your eyeballs to the highest bidder.
Any examples?
I was mainly kidding, but you could look at Signal as a company like that.
Y Combinator?
Re:Off-Facebook Activity
by chillydawg on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @12:30PM
(#20748830)
None, obviously.
Re:Off-Facebook Activity
by inflatableDodo on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @12:30PM
(#20748832)
The Masons.
It doesn't stand in those countries obviously it is available there. There is no reason to assume bad intentions either and your first statement was just a lot of assumptions and already has been corrected for being not completely true.