Re:Information operations directed at Hong Kong
by liuliu on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @09:16AM
(#20746614)
They both were kept their symbolic status at that time. HHDL was highest ranked in CCP before he fled. I don't know any evidence that sided with Koumintang backfired as you seemingly suggested for him.
Part of the system was kept (namingly the Lama leadership was kept symbolically), but the slavery is a history.
BTW, in the original post, I mentioned "70 years ago" as a way to suggest HHDL has a long and complicated life. His historical baggage by no way limits to Tibet before CCP though. It took him a long time to get his message what is today.
So on the one hand there was a lot of realpolitik in Tibetan theocracy; on the other hand the Chinese government had no qualms about continuing the system so long as it served their own purposes.