Re:South African bank advises against the use of password ma...
by zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC on Monday August 19, 2019 @02:32PM
(#20740400)
> unless it can prove that the transaction was legitimate.
And what is the standard of evidence for that?
> So basically, they can't put liability on the customer unless 2FA is used. The second factor is usually the credit card PIN.
That doesn't sound like a second factor? Or are you talking about POS transactions?
> Banks have to maintain a balance between convenience and risk of fraud.
Really, they don't. The bank should never decide to take on risks for me. There is nothing wrong with offering a feature where the customer can select to allow certain transactions without 2FA. There is everything wrong with forcing that feature on customers.
And what is the standard of evidence for that?
> So basically, they can't put liability on the customer unless 2FA is used. The second factor is usually the credit card PIN.
That doesn't sound like a second factor? Or are you talking about POS transactions?
> Banks have to maintain a balance between convenience and risk of fraud.
Really, they don't. The bank should never decide to take on risks for me. There is nothing wrong with offering a feature where the customer can select to allow certain transactions without 2FA. There is everything wrong with forcing that feature on customers.