The decision of when and how to use attributes is the thing that is most often done wrong or clumsily in an XML file. That is my point.
Re:YAML: Probably not so great after all
by johnchristopher on Sunday August 18, 2019 @04:04PM
(#20732486)
What if it's to be used by french speaking software/people ?
<lunch
env="outside"
envfr="dehors"
food="sandwiches"
foodfr="sandwichs"
drink="cola"
/>
Or <lunch
env="outside"
food="sandwiches"
drink="cola">
<label type="env" language="fr">Dehors</label>
<label type="env" language="de">Außenseite</label>
<label type="env" language="en">Outside</label>
</lunch>
Quite curious about it.I guess this way:
<lunch
env="outside"
food="sandwiches"
drink="cola">
<label xml:lang="fr">Dehors</label>
<label xml:lang="de">Draußen</label>
<label xml:lang="en">Outside</label>
</lunch>
says[0]the w3.
Re:YAML: Probably not so great after all
by johnchristopher on Monday August 19, 2019 @11:40AM
(#20738710)
I see, thanks. (I also see you corrected my broken German ^^).
Putting l10n/i18n data inline is generally not a pleasant experience, and this problem persists regardless of what serialization format you are using. Either have separate data files per-locale that are merged with the defaults or store the localized strings in a central location (ala your usual gettext setup).
I disagree. Back in the day we used attributes for everything that was key value and inner tags for anything with structure. We also formatted for clarity:
Compared with what we used to do, I look at attribute-less maven pom.xml with horror.