News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In the US, it's cheaper to build and operate wind farms t... by perl4ever on Sunday August 18, 2019 @08:07AM (#20729707)
I don't understand how you can compare the cost of a wind farm to fossil fuel. The former provides megawatts, and the latter provides megawatt-hours.

You would have to incorporate assumptions on lifespan, maintenance and/or amortization.

Re:In the US, it's cheaper to build and operate wind farms t... by Brakenshire on Sunday August 18, 2019 @08:31AM (#20729806)
Yes, that’s what they do, it’s called a levelized cost. These costs usually come with a sensitivity analysis of the impact of the different assumptions.

Wind or solar is actually often commissioned using a power purchase agreement for a certain price per kWh, guaranteed over a certain period.

Re:In the US, it's cheaper to build and operate wind farms t... by inflatableDodo on Sunday August 18, 2019 @12:25PM (#20731146)
Unless the wind turbines are trapped in some sort of time freezing status field, I would generally assume that they both can be measured in megawatt-hours. Or you can multiply out by 3.6 to get to gigajoules if you want more sensible units to play with.