News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Software architects should be involved in earliest system... by nilkn on Saturday August 17, 2019 @11:10PM (#20727999)
Some directors may have dozens, if not hundreds or even thousands, of people under them directly or indirectly. This rapidly grows beyond the scale where the director can jump in for anyone in the tree beneath them.

Your comment probably applies for a team lead with a half dozen IC reports. Add in one other layer (i.e., a half dozen team lead reports) and it might still apply in some cases. But double that number or add in another layer and things are probably far beyond the scale you were imagining. The manager’s job now requires a vastly different toolset that most developers know nothing about, have no experience with, and generally wouldn’t even know how to think about.

Re:Software architects should be involved in earliest system... by username90 on Sunday August 18, 2019 @01:18AM (#20728390)
You don't have to do it recursively, a director should be able to substitute his reports but not necessarily their reports.
Re:Software architects should be involved in earliest system... by siggen on Sunday August 18, 2019 @07:42AM (#20729629)
Right. I wasn’t clear above. I do not mean recursive. For example, I don’t expect a CEO to do dev work: different skillset.