Re:The electric car as a talisman of false hope
by acidburnNSA on Friday August 16, 2019 @09:03AM
(#20714731)
This is a common but incorrect assumption. Biofuels are very far from carbon neutral. Renewable is in no way restricted to the desirable.
As an extreme case in point, wood in particular is a horrifying energy source due to health detriment from particulates.
Have a look at some data:
https://partofthething.com/thoughts/wp-content/uploads/ipcc-...
Source: Schlomer S., et.al., 2014: Annex III: Technology-specific cost and performance parameters. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the 5th Assessment Report of the IPCC
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5...
Re:The electric car as a talisman of false hope
by dTal on Saturday August 17, 2019 @02:41PM
(#20725539)
Setting aside other issues with it like particulate emission, how can it be anything other than carbon neutral? Where could the surplus carbon possibly come from?
Re:The electric car as a talisman of false hope
by acidburnNSA on Thursday August 22, 2019 @10:51AM
(#20768715)
When biofuels are valuable, people clear forests to make biofuel. The carbon payback period can be up to 1000 years. It's called indirect land use change [1,2]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ILUC
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biofuel#Greenhouse_gas_emissio...
Re:The electric car as a talisman of false hope
by yellowapple on Friday August 16, 2019 @11:19AM
(#20716034)
Okay, but the problem we're trying to solve is the carbon being in the atmosphere, so even biofuel is objectively far worse than, say, solar.
Renewable is a more strict term than carbon-neutral, it's true, but all "renewables" are by definition closed-loop and hence carbon-neutral.