News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rust 1.37.0 by rkangel on Friday August 16, 2019 @05:08AM (#20713401)
I've already felt the slowdown in changes. I did have a (little) break from Rust and the only things that have changed are ergonomic improvements and the async stuff. This is a predictable outcome given the roadmap for this year was one of stability for the language.

When async/await stabilises, I think it's going to be less about the language changing and more about the ecosystem. I think there is going to be a lot of development on top of async over the next few years and we're going to learn a lot about the right way to structure programs and deliver useful abstractions. This is going to be particularly true in the embedded space I care the most about.

This is the hidden downside of having a good package manager - knowing how to use the ecosystem is as much of a skill in real world programming as knowing how to use the language. To be clear though - that cost is entirely worth it.

Re:Rust 1.37.0 by foldr on Friday August 16, 2019 @06:34AM (#20713763)
It could be. Rust has been stable Real Soon Now for quite some years.
Re:Rust 1.37.0 by rkangel on Friday August 16, 2019 @06:51AM (#20713843)
"Stable" is not a binary condition, and Rust has been moving continuously in a 'more stable' direction.
Re:Rust 1.37.0 by foldr on Friday August 16, 2019 @08:48AM (#20714616)
I'm not sure I agree with that. Async/await is a major new feature and is just landing now.
Re:Rust 1.37.0 by skept on Friday August 16, 2019 @09:26PM (#20721317)
Python is over 20 years old and got async/await only 4 years ago. I think most people would still consider Python a fairly stable language.