News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CEO compensation has grown 940% since 1978 by dragonwriter on Thursday August 15, 2019 @02:20PM (#20708077)
If you assume CEOs are basically success signalling devices without active influence on success whose prestige (and thus, the success they signal) is harmed by association with failure, that makes sense: the added pay is compensation for harm to prestige.
Re:CEO compensation has grown 940% since 1978 by MiroF on Thursday August 15, 2019 @02:25PM (#20708136)
Yes that would probably explain the negative correlation.

That said, if good CEOs actually controlled the direction of the company and were compensated higher to attract talent - I would expect that to override the negative effect for a net positive. Since that's not the case, I think as you suggest that CEOs are "without active influence on success"