Re:The Sinister Brutalism of Shipping Container Architecture
by xemdetia on Thursday August 15, 2019 @10:29AM
(#20705518)
I'll also throw in the fact that even for some reason you wanted metal, we've also solved the 'make a metal building wherever you want it' fairly well too. It is designed for adding doors, windows, comes in a kit form, and also breathes and can be insulated to have pleasant thermal properties. Even just in $/sqft having rechecked on this idea the price was never so much better than other kinds of buildings that are more suited to be in livable spaces.
Really what I would have wanted to see is people handling disposal of containers and then using the broken down materials to build a structure and/or just being smarter about reclaiming the material, but I haven't seen that come up in passively looking into it.
Re:The Sinister Brutalism of Shipping Container Architecture
by im3w1l on Wednesday August 14, 2019 @08:49PM
(#20701564)
I think the issue is that people don't trust themselves to build a wooden box with adequate structural integrity.
Shipping containers on the other hand are cheap, easily available and proven.
Re:The Sinister Brutalism of Shipping Container Architecture
by rumanator on Thursday August 15, 2019 @01:43AM
(#20702893)
> I think the issue is that people don't trust themselves to build a wooden box with adequate structural integrity.
Why is that a concern? There are plenty of people who are more than capable of designing and constructing buildings. Even if you need to pay for their expertise, their work costs a fraction of the total building cost.
Plus I would wonder what, if any coatings were on the shipping containers, and if they were toxic, and do they degrade over time.
Plus wood is significantly easier to work with.