News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Sinister Brutalism of Shipping Container Architecture by mjevans on Wednesday August 14, 2019 @06:39PM (#20700768)
You'd probably have better luck subverting existing regulatory infrastructure that closely matches your use-case.

Instead of tiny homes, try thinking within the regulatory box of "classifies as an RV or towed camper". That might allow you to bypass some of the other limitations you were facing.

Re:The Sinister Brutalism of Shipping Container Architecture by PorterDuff on Wednesday August 14, 2019 @08:23PM (#20701393)
Exactly. There was a Kirsten Dirksen video showing some cabins built on a piece of property that was zoned (I think) for mobile homes. Voila', they welded some big wheels on the bottom of the structures.

They still seemed poorly laid out with crummy bathrooms (in this case, no piped water and a terlet that was basically an indoor plastic porta-potty) but I did admire the law-skirting.

There can also be avoidance of property taxes in some states I believe.

Re:The Sinister Brutalism of Shipping Container Architecture by sixdimensional on Wednesday August 14, 2019 @10:01PM (#20701969)
There are definitely places where this works, which is what I think in part lead to the building of most tiny homes on a wheeled, towable chassis. Of course, that limits you though into building that class of tiny home, and I personally feel that smaller but more permanent tiny homes with a foundation/slab are still a very economical, usable and viable solution.

You're right though, I think the key to making this work without trying to get laws changed is finding the right combination of laws and solution/use case that remains within the regulations. This is definitely doable in certain locales and not in others. If I'm really going to make what I wanted to do work, I will have to find the right balance of factors.

I was so surprised when I started reading zoning rules for plots of land that I was looking at to build a tiny house - some had minimum home size requirements, others had explicitly outlawed the use of any such wheeled dwelling precisely to prevent people from doing what you said. Some of the larger plots of land that were quite inexpensive required a 2,000sqft and up dwelling to be built if they were purchased and used for residential purposes!

Re:The Sinister Brutalism of Shipping Container Architecture by abraae on Wednesday August 14, 2019 @08:21PM (#20701385)
Around here, you would try and classify your tiny dwelling as "transportable".

This means having it sitting on, rather than attached to, the ground, and having some "skids" on the piles.

Re:The Sinister Brutalism of Shipping Container Architecture by AJ007 on Wednesday August 14, 2019 @06:48PM (#20700813)
Reminds me of the Tesla tent assembly line.