Fewer Than Half of Google Searches Now Result in a Click

Re:Fewer Than Half of Google Searches Now Result in a Click by noobermin on Tuesday August 13, 2019 @02:38PM (#20688905)

Curated might be better, Google has been wrong in their answers in the past.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Fewer Than Half of Google Searches Now Result in a Click by wongarsu on Tuesday August 13, 2019 @03:09PM (#20689185)

Not only are the sources of WolframAlpha curated, they even go the extra step to make sure it's correct. From their FAQ:

"How is Wolfram|Alpha's data checked?

We use a portfolio of automated and manual methods, including statistics, visualization, source cross-checking and expert review. With trillions of pieces of data, it's inevitable that there are still errors out there.

[...]

How is real-time data curated?

Wolfram|Alpha effectively checks real-time data (such as weather, earthquakes, market prices, etc.) against built-in criteria and models. If an unexpected deviation is found, Wolfram|Alpha will normally indicate it, for example by showing lines as dashed."

https://www.wolframalpha.com/faqs/#data-in-wolfram-alpha

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Fewer Than Half of Google Searches Now Result in a Click by MereInterest on Tuesday August 13, 2019 @03:29PM (#20689359)

I think the best one I've seen was when Google's natural language processing mistook the subject of a sentence. Rather than saying that the Mariner 10 space probe used a gravity assist on Venus to reach Mercury, it instead said that Mercury received a gravity assist from Venus.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Fewer Than Half of Google Searches Now Result in a Click by tzs on Tuesday August 13, 2019 @04:44PM (#20690039)

Or maybe Google was getting its astronomy from a site that believes Immanuel Velikovsky's theories... [1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worlds_in_Collision

[ Parent | on HN ]