News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Paternity Leave Was Crucial After the Birth of My Child by legostormtroopr on Tuesday August 13, 2019 @12:43AM (#20682893)
> person giving birth

You mean the "mother"?

Re:Paternity Leave Was Crucial After the Birth of My Child by Broken_Hippo on Tuesday August 13, 2019 @05:15AM (#20683957)
Folks give birth without becoming a mother and one can be a mother without giving birth.

Surrogates exist, for example. Folks give infants up for adoption. In this case, you can wind up with a mother who didn't birth the child and a person who gave birth, yet didn't actually become a mother except in a loose sense of the word.

On the sadder end, stillbirths still happen and society doesn't really consider this person to be a mother. (I'm personally fine with whatever the parents choose to be called).

Re:Paternity Leave Was Crucial After the Birth of My Child by mabbo on Tuesday August 13, 2019 @08:07AM (#20684943)
There's always more complexity than you know. There are trans men with wombs who give birth. There are are surrogates. There are 1000 other situations that I don't even know about. The law says "person giving birth", and I like that choice of wording. It doesn't exclude someone who is in a new, unexpected situation.

Just the same, the law says that the two parents can share the weeks of work off, not "mother and father", as that's clearly not always going to be an accurate representation.

It's not political correctness, just accuracy in terms.

Re:Paternity Leave Was Crucial After the Birth of My Child by kgwgk on Tuesday August 13, 2019 @07:43AM (#20684762)
It could also be father, stop assuming genders!