One thing about the App. As someone dealing a lot with customers, UX, UI design etc. You definitely need another logo.

This icon says "This is something really old and complicated. This is for the 40-something businessman, not for you tech-savy youth", or something in that direction.

Agreed. We’re planning to revise in the next year or so. At the moment we wanted the brand recognition so that existing customers who are looking to use the Mac version know and trust that this is the same product. Modernising the icon can come in a subsequent update. Cheers!

Honestly literally any other icon would be better, and that’s something you should do today (not later). I understand that you think brand recognition is really important, but the current logo screams “I’m a Windows application ported over!”

You will just sell more copies, straight up, if you change the logo.

I'm not sure I agree with you, in that the recognition is more important than the new icon here. I think, if you keep the name the same, I'd swap out the icon faster to have some eye caught new customers instead. But that's a hard decision to make, I can completely understand your argument.

Agree with the other commenter. Change out that icon ASAP. I definitely wouldn't click on that if I hadn't seen this on HN. The existing is actually blurry on retina/hidpi screens.

Personally (given the name of the tool) I recommend something turtle themed.

Since the App Store shows icons at a large size, it's blurry on non-retina screens too:

https://i.imgur.com/kJiaHwM.png

Seeing that icon, I would assume the quality of app I'm getting is not the quality I expect for $30.

Per Apple's documentation, you need icon sizes up to 1024x1024. This represents a 512x512 size at 2x DPI.

https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guideline...

At the very least for the short term you could hire someone at an online freelancing site to trace the existing icon into vectors and make larger versions of it.

Lol, love the turtle idea.

We're going to use the new icon we've designed, the first one in this image: https://twitter.com/secretGeek/status/1161965759846744065

Yes, I have the same feedback: please use a modern icon. Love the concept though, nice work.

30 bucks for a screenshot app... 3 bucks I can easily life with, and would instantly grab my wallet without thinking. 10 bucks or 20 bucks even if I would use this often. But 30 is quite steep IMHO

I have many times ended up billing more time because of TimeSnapper - time I would otherwise have forgotten about.

For me, it is worth the price.

I have used TimeSnapper on Windows for at least 5 years.

It is a productivity/billings app that happens to use screenshots as a data source.

It's not a screenshot app.

How is me making a script to take a screenshot of my screen every 5 seconds and then putting them in a folder for each day any different?

The only thing feature I can see from the apps page is that you can play back the screenshots at whatever speed you want, which hardly warrants $30.

this is indeed basically what I meant. but seeing the other comments I can see an use/product case for this. As long as it's not subscription based I have no issue with the pricing. Although I wouldn't grab my wallet at this pricepoint

$30 seems kinda high for what it does.

You can do this with cron and the mac screenshot cli. I have been for years. It’s the best way to fill in your time sheet.

I also made a small react app that shows thumbnails and supports zoom and splitting the time with export. Glad to push it to a repo if people want it.

Please do!

Alternative: ScreenNinja (cheaper I think, $20)

http://getscreenninja.com/

An alternative I used to use when I wanted this feature:

`while [ 1 ];do vardate=$(date +%d\-%m\-%Y\_%H.%M.%S); screencapture -t jpg -x ~/Desktop/project_name/$vardate.jpg; sleep 10; done`

I’m guessing the target market is users who are not proficient in scripting, but rather business users who want to monitor their employees or non-coders who want to retroactively be able to construct time logs of their work.

Came here expecting to see this as a top-level comment. Really not sure why someone (here on HN) would pay $30 rather than just write a simple script like this.

I could see paying $30 for the options/playback. I'm not sure if `screencapture` gets all the desktops or just the active one or what. Also the playback UI looks nice and is a much better way to check what you were doing and for how long than a directory of images would be. If it was a subscription services I'd be looking for alternatives but one-time purchase? $30 seems reasonable.

Based on the man page it captures the 'screen' for all monitors unless otherwise constrained by options.

Here’s a comment answering this question when we announced the beta. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19700265

I’m not at a computer or Mac right now. Would getting different monitors be easy?

ScreenNinja seems to also provide a number of features that would prob take a while to implement if you wanted them

Personally, I’m not so concerned about the logo. If anything, it seems kitschy and somewhat unprofessional, but that alone wouldn’t stop me from trying it.

The price is a bit more daunting. A lower introductory price would definitely help me get over that hump.

But frankly my biggest concern is disk space. If I have 4K monitors, how often does this thing fire and how much disk space does each screenshot take? How long until I’ve filled up a full 1TB of expensive SSD?

I plan to use it alongside Toggl time tracker. Toggl desktop client has a "Record Timeline" feature but it syncs the data to the cloud while I'd rather store it locally.

$30 is a lot, that's the same amount as Factorio. Of course, something is worth what people will pay for it, but this seems a very small thing to sell at that price point.

Been using the beta for a while. And really enjoying TimeSnapper. Were any features added since beta or it’s mostly bug free now? $30 is a bit steep for me right now.

(We're also separately emailing beta contributors, as we have done throughout the beta period.)

Also, if you ever want to ask questions about organizing a beta, I'm always keen to answer. (Though Jon did almost all of the work on this one, thanks Jon.)

Maybe you can put an article out about that, if one of you guys enjoys doing those :) Sounds like something I'd be interested to read.

Okay I’ve added it to my backlog (I blog at secretGeek.net)