Re:Black Hat Talk About ‘Time AI’ Causes Uproar, Is Deleted ...
by jlgaddis on Sunday August 11, 2019 @03:00AM
(#20666780)
The speaker('s company) paid a hefty price for him to be there to present. Black Hat doesn't wanna dissuade any other potential vendors from not giving them their money.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Black Hat Talk About ‘Time AI’ Causes Uproar, Is Deleted ...
by Twisol on Sunday August 11, 2019 @04:23AM
(#20667055)
I feel like you could make the same case for not loudly renouncing "Time AI". If Black Hat were to stand by this sponsor, I would wonder if other potential sponsors might actively withhold funds specifically to avoid being associated with "Time AI". Like the YouTube adpocalypse -- the media storm around certain kinds of content made advertisers uncomfortable with being associated with that content.
Re:Black Hat Talk About ‘Time AI’ Causes Uproar, Is Deleted ...
by Nasrudith on Sunday August 11, 2019 @08:34AM
(#20667881)
Well part of the point with sponsors is to find someone that can make money without 'selling out' and doing major damage to themselves as a conference brand. "Time AI" isn't paying nearly enough money to be worth the damage that not renouncing them would do.
Re:Black Hat Talk About ‘Time AI’ Causes Uproar, Is Deleted ...
by Barrin92 on Sunday August 11, 2019 @06:39AM
(#20667491)
I think dissuading these sorts of people would be a win for everybody, at least it puts the bar a little higher for the next company who is buying themselves a spot.
Re:Black Hat Talk About ‘Time AI’ Causes Uproar, Is Deleted ...
by tptacek on Sunday August 11, 2019 @02:12PM
(#20669540)
Black Hat publicly disavowed the talk. Tell us more about what Black Hat does and doesn't want to do?