Re:Theories of Error Back-Propagation in the Brain
by londons_explore on Sunday August 11, 2019 @01:41AM
(#20666461)
"Were guessing plausible ways the brain might work in ways similar to the machine learning world, but have no data to back it up"
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Theories of Error Back-Propagation in the Brain
by ahartmetz on Sunday August 11, 2019 @05:58AM
(#20667364)
Backpropagation feels like a pretty gross hack to me anyway. It is a powerful component that still needs a large amount of additional hand-engineering to do more than recognize shapes it has seen before. And it's quite mathematical, which seems kind of difficult to implement in a brain.
Edit: The article and code try to show how backpropagation might work given neuron behavior. I'll leave discussing the quality of the model to biologists.
Re:Theories of Error Back-Propagation in the Brain
by marmaduke on Sunday August 11, 2019 @07:02AM
(#20667562)
> And it's quite mathematical, which seems kind of difficult to implement in a brain.
Another commenter pointed out that you don't need perfect backprop, some random backprijections are sufficient.
Re:Theories of Error Back-Propagation in the Brain
by GChevalier on Sunday August 11, 2019 @04:32AM
(#20667081)
> "The relationship of spike-time-dependent plasticity to other models requires further clarifying work"
- I got something for that, in fact I think I discovered that backpropagation engenders STDP:
https://github.com/guillaume-chevalier/Spiking-Neural-Networ...