A black hole without an event horizon is a naked singularity[1], a concept in theoretical physics resulting from looking at the mathematical equations that describe black holes and observing that the event horizon's radius becomes undefined at certain angular velocities[2]. It's not clear if it can exist in reality.
AFAIK (not a physicist), gravitational force of a specific object (as a function of distance) cannot be discontinuous, can it? It's definitely not under the classical F=G(M1)(M2)/r^2 equation. Force can't be discontinuous unless mass changes discontinuously or space changes discontinuously. But I don't know if there are extreme conditions (and a naked singularity might qualify) where that equation breaks down, or is thought to break down?
[0] to support the movie Interstellar, several people worked on an accurate rendering, based on known physics, of a rotating black hole: https://astronomynow.com/2015/02/14/interstellar-technology-...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_singularity
[2] https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/147034/rotating-...
Theoretically a black hole can spin faster than the speed of light since the event horizon is just space, not matter, and space can certainly exceed the speed of light (see expansion of the universe).
IIRC from relevant literature, the event horizon shrinks with increasing speed until it vanishes once the speed of light is exceeded and leaves behind a naked singularity; a black hole with no event horizon.