By being outraged at one cop's admission of a short cut to finding people who are due in court we are bringing the abomination of robots down on our heads.
And... humanity needs to have a serious discussion about the merits and risks of all of that before we rush to deploy AI.
You may, however, still choose to do it anyway, knowing full well that it's immoral.
If killing one innocent person will somehow magically save one million, that too is immoral. And I'd kill that one person to save the million regardless, accepting that it is an immoral act. It's a worthwhile thing to live with, to save so many. Obviously this is in the land of outlandish hypotheticals. Non-the-less, the morality is just the same if the ratio is 1 to 10, 1 to 100, or 1 to one million: intentionally killing - murdering - an innocent person is immoral in all circumstances.
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.iflscience.com/editors-bl...
How about: go to their place of residence and knock on their door?
Or: go to their place of work and knock on the door?
After those have failed, try getting a wiretap warrant for their telecom devices. Only after you've got that wiretap warrant, locate them and arrest there.
You know... the stuff that law enforcement is _supposed_ to be doing...
Following a vehicle whose license plate, or its owner, is associated with outstanding crimes makes sense. Following a random vehicle which has not yet committed a crime is wrong. Following a vehicle because it has black people in it is illegal, unethical, and racist. Following a vehicle because an occupant shows up on a face search database should be morally reprehensible for the very same reasons.