News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Object Oriented Programming has Failed Us by SwellJoe on Monday June 02, 2008 @04:55AM (#206569)
And yet, somehow, I've never seen a single line of live ADA code...and there are literally hundreds of millions of lines of C code doing work right now. Not only that, someone is almost certainly starting a new program written in C right now...and now...and now...and now. And...you, guessed it, now.

I'm sure Ada had a useful life, possibly even in a niche where C would never be an effective tool. I was just saying that design-by-committee, even with a lot of user input, is probably not the right way to build a timeless programming language, and that building a language while using the language probably is.

Re:Object Oriented Programming has Failed Us by gaius on Monday June 02, 2008 @05:29AM (#206579)
Funny, I look at Ada every day ('cept it's called PL/SQL).
Re:Object Oriented Programming has Failed Us by huherto on Monday June 02, 2008 @04:45PM (#207252)
Please explain
Re:Object Oriented Programming has Failed Us by gaius on Monday June 02, 2008 @05:19PM (#207299)
Ada never caught on as a general purpose programming language, but a subset of it lives on in PL/SQL, the embedded language in Oracle. It's not the most flexible or elegant language, but it's easy enough to learn and extremely reliable. It's all about choosing the right tool for the job. Sure you can run C in-process with your database, but unless you really, really have to it's a bit pointless to risk i.