Re:Swap, swap, swap, and bad places to work
by VectorLock on Friday August 09, 2019 @10:09AM
(#20654439)
If your application starts running slower it should be killed. Redundancy means not having to worry about graceful anything.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Swap, swap, swap, and bad places to work
by jmiserez on Friday August 09, 2019 @03:29PM
(#20657571)
You've stated this multiple times in this thread now.
Maybe consider that not everyone has the same use case as you: some people are running larger chunks of computation per node or even stateful applications. Even when they could be killed and are redundant, running a bit slower for a moment until they recover may be preferable to restarting the node (which also takes time).
Re:Swap, swap, swap, and bad places to work
by VectorLock on Friday August 09, 2019 @04:42PM
(#20658100)
There are lots of different application models the issue here is ton of rule-of-thumb regression from "redundancy is important" to "swap is okay after-all I guess."