News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Svalbard is as close as you can get to a place with open ... by dragonwriter on Thursday August 08, 2019 @02:17PM (#20647068)
> > New York (second poorest in the US)

> On what basis?

Probably the same basis by which California is the poorest: statewide cost-of-living adjusted poverty line.

There's a number of ways this measure is potebtially misleading; for instance, both New York and California are diverse states where the local cost of living varies considerably, and the numbers for any CoL adjusted measure would look very different if instead of a statewide CoL you used, say, county CoL based on residence and then aggregated the statewide numbers.

But using this or other statewide CoL-based metrics does get at something that mean or median income or measuring against the even less relevant national poverty line does not.

Re:Svalbard is as close as you can get to a place with open ... by bobthepanda on Thursday August 08, 2019 @03:06PM (#20647535)
Yeah, when it comes to New York, CoL, income, etc. vary widely; Albany, Buffalo, Binghamton, and NYC are all incredibly different. And as far as I know county level CoL isn't so great either, depending on how big your county is; even in New York, Huntington and Riverhead have vastly different local economies (to the point where there are occasionally calls to split Suffolk County in two), to say nothing of massive counties like King County, WA.
Re:Svalbard is as close as you can get to a place with open ... by rayiner on Thursday August 08, 2019 @03:37PM (#20647843)
That’s true in Virginia too. But in the flip side, most people live in the expensive metro areas.

The chart I posted uses the BEA’s regional price parity figures: https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/methodologies/RPP201...

Re:Svalbard is as close as you can get to a place with open ... by triceratops on Thursday August 08, 2019 @02:25PM (#20647153)
Interesting and good points. Thanks!