Re:LA getting serious about lifting parking requirements in ...
by mktmkr on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @03:45PM
(#20638149)
Car shares are definitely not for driving to work but I fail to see why you can't use them to pick up your kids. Car sharing solves the problem where people can easily journey to work without a car, but they want one for other purposes like shopping.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:LA getting serious about lifting parking requirements in ...
by sokoloff on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @05:27PM
(#20639296)
Wouldn’t most residents of the building need the shared car at roughly the same time to pick up their kids from school?
Re:LA getting serious about lifting parking requirements in ...
by mayneack on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @11:25PM
(#20641580)
If most people need it at roughly the same time to get to a small number of places, then it's an obvious use for public transport.
Re:LA getting serious about lifting parking requirements in ...
by mktmkr on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @05:46PM
(#20639489)
No because fewer than 20% of households in Los Angeles have school-age children. That puts a ceiling on your worst case right there.
Re:LA getting serious about lifting parking requirements in ...
by sokoloff on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @06:05PM
(#20639642)
Provided that the housing wasn’t in some way differentially appealing to families with children (cheap 3BR, good schools, parks nearby, other amenities)
Re:LA getting serious about lifting parking requirements in ...
by briandear on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @04:57PM
(#20638961)
Does Uber carry approved child safety seats?
Re:LA getting serious about lifting parking requirements in ...
by mktmkr on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @05:07PM
(#20639086)
No, but to make sure we are talking about the same thing, a car share is a bit like renting a car by the hour. Uber is a computer-dispatched taxi service. Uber is not "car sharing". It is also not their other bullshit moniker "ride sharing"