Re:Divers Find Remains of Ancient Temple in Sunken Egyptian ...
by smileysteve on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @10:51AM
(#20635244)
57m on a single tank would just be so short too; air goes quick at that depth, and the longer you stay down the longer you have to take getting up.
Re:Divers Find Remains of Ancient Temple in Sunken Egyptian ...
by diveanon on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @11:35AM
(#20635664)
it was definitely not the plan.
I remember being hooked on the wall and seeing my bubbles descending behind me. That dive felt more like mountain climbing than diving.
Re:Divers Find Remains of Ancient Temple in Sunken Egyptian ...
by nradov on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @02:44PM
(#20637620)
Some walls have vicious down currents, but if you just swim away from the wall a few meters the current will decline and you can establish positive buoyancy.
Re:Divers Find Remains of Ancient Temple in Sunken Egyptian ...
by diveanon on Thursday August 08, 2019 @05:49AM
(#20643053)
You're right, but I wasn't willing to take that risk.
One of the divers in my group was already in a mild state of panic and I didn't want to chance them letting go of the wall and descending another 10m.
I had a plan to deal with the current, but oxygen toxicity is another thing entirely.
Re:Divers Find Remains of Ancient Temple in Sunken Egyptian ...
by nradov on Thursday August 08, 2019 @10:54AM
(#20645125)
Oxygen toxicity isn't really a factor at that depth; you'd run out of air on a single tank before experiencing any toxicity symptoms. The immediate concerns would be narcosis and hypercapnia.
You're right that 45m puts of out of range of most divers, but it is definitely still a doable dive with decent divers on twins and a deco stage.
The visibility in the photo looks decent for a silty bottom, I wonder what the current is like since it is in the Nile.
I am also curious about what caused it to become submerged in 45m of water 1500 years ago.