News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Shared e-scooters aren’t always as green as other transport options. Parent comment

Re:Shared e-scooters aren’t always as green as other transpo... by yholio on Sunday August 04, 2019 @12:46PM (#20607616)
Early bikes probably had similar reliability problems. Once the scooter design stabilizes, we will see refurbished units and mass recycling of consumables.

There is nothing inherently wasteful or prone to rapid breakdown in scooters; the fact that there is economic reason to dump them after 100 days only points out how inefficient is everything else and how improperly we tax environmental damage.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Shared e-scooters aren’t always as green as other transpo... by Retric on Sunday August 04, 2019 @01:31PM (#20607931)
They are prone to break down as complex machines dumped in random locations out in the weather.

Scooters can last for years if kept inside and well cared for.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Shared e-scooters aren’t always as green as other transpo... by Scoundreller on Sunday August 04, 2019 @02:13PM (#20608232)
Right, but this is about shared scooters without any of that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Shared e-scooters aren’t always as green as other transpo... by baybal2 on Sunday August 04, 2019 @03:34PM (#20608730)
The point more about a shared vehicle being more wasteful than a privately owned one:

Bikesharing in China resulted in many times more bikes being produced than ones owned privately. Even insurance and license demanding schemes like LiuBike (they rent electric 50cc equivalents) ran into that, despite their vehicles not being as "disposable" as flopped Mobike.

[ Parent | on HN ]