Rustgo: Calling Rust from Go with near-zero overhead (2017)

Re:Rustgo: Calling Rust from Go with near-zero overhead (2017) by kbenson on Saturday August 03, 2019 @01:22PM (#20601514)

Except it wasn't the third. It was like something between the 50's and low 100's. There were lots of languages then, most being unpopular.

C was just intended to be third in that very specific lineage, and I wouldn't be surprised to find it wasn't really third and just making the claim with its name.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rustgo: Calling Rust from Go with near-zero overhead (2017) by coldtea on Saturday August 03, 2019 @03:03PM (#20602008)

>There were lots of languages then, most being unpopular.

Not to mention several more advanced than C, Go, or even Rust... (Lisp, for one, Smalltalk for another)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rustgo: Calling Rust from Go with near-zero overhead (2017) by kbenson on Saturday August 03, 2019 @04:52PM (#20602603)

Well, it depends on what you mean by advanced, and if you're just considering the language or language plus compiler/runtime, but I take your point, and mostly agree with it.

[ Parent | on HN ]