Re:Empress trees absorb about 103 tons of carbon a year per ...
by Merg on Saturday August 03, 2019 @04:10AM
(#20599232)
It is basically in progress by largest forest owner in Poland - state company to be exact.
It is called Carbon Forest Sylviculture (Leśne Gospodarstwo Węglowe). Over all it is more of a marketing scheme with very small impact. We tried to increase sequestration rates with correct sylvicultural regimes.
Currently it is more like a way for companies to sound ecological. IDK if it can be profitable, remember land and everything cost and I think those profit margins would be very small.
Re:Empress trees absorb about 103 tons of carbon a year per ...
by hef19898 on Friday August 02, 2019 @03:24PM
(#20595814)
Might be a worthwhile start-up idea... I'm wondering...
Re:Empress trees absorb about 103 tons of carbon a year per ...
by markdown on Friday August 02, 2019 @08:16PM
(#20597763)
Re:Empress trees absorb about 103 tons of carbon a year per ...
by tim333 on Saturday August 03, 2019 @05:46AM
(#20599530)
Ah. To summarise those some previous companies, Timbercorp and Great Southern pushed planting similar trees as a get rich quick thing and then went bust leaving useless trees and a lot of people with large losses. World Tree, featured in the Bloomberg article say they are different and do it better. I guess it's a tricky business to do well.
There are political and practical difficulties doing that but there are also difficulties with wrecking the climate that might outweigh those.