News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Goldman Sachs is spending $100M to shave milliseconds off... by 1e-9 on Friday August 02, 2019 @05:18AM (#20591617)
Over very short time scales, the price fluctuations vary from almost pure noise to almost pure signal. The almost pure noise situation occurs far more often, but even then, with good estimation techniques, you can extract a signal component that can improve pricing a small amount. Improving many interrelated prices by small amounts can lead to a significant overall improvement to the markets. The almost pure signal situation occurs far less often, but it is almost always extremely important to overall stability. Handling it well can minimize market overreactions and extreme events such as flash crashes and market panics.
Re:Goldman Sachs is spending $100M to shave milliseconds off... by NohatCoder on Friday August 02, 2019 @11:23AM (#20593690)
The faster you can trade, the faster you can flash crash. The current state is that bots can crash the market faster than humans can react, how does that help stability?
Re:Goldman Sachs is spending $100M to shave milliseconds off... by 1e-9 on Saturday August 03, 2019 @02:03AM (#20598934)
The faster you trade, the faster you can detect and help limit or prevent a flash crash caused by others trading poorly.