Re:Goldman Sachs is spending $100M to shave milliseconds off...
by arugulum on Friday August 02, 2019 @03:31AM
(#20591215)
>Conversely, if sub-second resolution is somehow "a good", then by extension sub-millisecond price discovery is "even better". There are some insane people that state this kind of gibberish with a straight face.
if sub-second Internet latency is somehow "a good", then by extension sub-millisecond Internet latency is "even better". There are some insane people that state this kind of gibberish with a straight face.
If millisecond are good, then surely microseconds are even better! Next... nanosecond resolution Internet latency for the uuuuuultimate speed of information.
if sub-second Internet latency is somehow "a good", then by extension sub-millisecond Internet latency is "even better". There are some insane people that state this kind of gibberish with a straight face.
If millisecond are good, then surely microseconds are even better! Next... nanosecond resolution Internet latency for the uuuuuultimate speed of information.
Surely this is crazy talk!