It also currently, but unsustainably, produces a large fraction of all food on earth.
Here’s an article from 2012 with some anecdotes if numbers aren’t your thing: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/14/magazine/californias-cent...
Here is a table of crops: https://republicans-naturalresources.house.gov/newsroom/docu...
(it doesn’t seem to include exports, so the numbers are low-balled)
It is clearly being over-farmed, but the solution to that is crop rotation and letting the fields periodically go fallow.
Blanketing it with solar panels is likely irreversible.
I can't help but feel like it's a subtle contradiction to propose that without constant watering the soil in California will crack up and vanish and that's not going to happen with crop rotation but will happen with crop rotation (as if many farms in California aren't already forced to do this because of the nature of our groundwater).
Are you also opposed to orchards? They're full of solar panels that make fruit rather than electricity.