News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on iTerm2 3.3. Parent comment

Re:iTerm2 3.3 by penagwin on Thursday August 01, 2019 @03:58PM (#20587687)
I'm I reading that right that the input lag has increased on average? And while the minimum might have improved by .4 or is within measurement error?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:iTerm2 3.3 by flypaca on Thursday August 01, 2019 @04:00PM (#20587714)
The minimum data point for iTerm 3.2.9 have shifted towards the left. Overall the 3.3 has better average.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:iTerm2 3.3 by penagwin on Thursday August 01, 2019 @04:02PM (#20587734)
It's average is still ~6ms higher though?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:iTerm2 3.3 by trca on Thursday August 01, 2019 @04:22PM (#20587940)
The 3.3 average is ~6ms faster...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:iTerm2 3.3 by egwor on Thursday August 01, 2019 @04:25PM (#20587971)
The columns aren't aligned quite right. That's what I (mis)read too.
[ Parent | on HN ]