News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Equifax removed the $125 claim payout option after millio... by pmiller2 on Wednesday July 31, 2019 @11:50PM (#20580948)
Nothing is really “explicit” when it’s buried in pages of small print legalese. If everyone just read (forget understood, just read) everything they ever signed or agreed to thoroughly, life would slow down significantly.
Re:Equifax removed the $125 claim payout option after millio... by g051051 on Thursday August 01, 2019 @07:23AM (#20582845)
Take a look at a CC application and see where the information on going to a CRA is. I just went to a random online store and started a CC application. Down in the legal section, right in the first couple of sections, clearly visible:

"Credit Reports: You agree that we have a right to obtain a credit report in connection with our review of your application and after we establish an account, to administer the account. You agree that we may report to others our credit experience with you. At your request we will provide the name and address of each consumer-reporting agency from which we obtained a report about you."

Was it plastered across the very top of the form in bold type? No. Was it "buried in pages of small print legalese"? No.

Re:Equifax removed the $125 claim payout option after millio... by innocenat on Thursday August 01, 2019 @02:23AM (#20581412)
Many CC contracts I have signed (not US or EU banks) have explicit section and additional (mandatory) signature specifically for sharing data with credit reporting company.