News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Slim Binaries (1997) by thefreeman on Wednesday July 31, 2019 @12:09PM (#20575564)
Don't most compilers already do this?
Re:Slim Binaries (1997) by acqq on Wednesday July 31, 2019 @04:41PM (#20578320)
Speaking about C and C++ on Linux, I have an impression that the compilers seldom can decide that the whole functions aren't used, especially because most libraries and programs "export" "everything" by default, so only on run-time it can be decided what will be actually used -- the last linking step happens only when you start the program, by the loader.
Re:Slim Binaries (1997) by saagarjha on Wednesday July 31, 2019 @12:31PM (#20575782)
Yeah, isn't this just link-time optimization?
Re:Slim Binaries (1997) by throwaway542134 on Wednesday July 31, 2019 @01:21PM (#20576306)
It's called dead code elimination/optimization and compilers can do it without LTO, with LTO you can can get more savings but ymmv.
Re:Slim Binaries (1997) by saagarjha on Wednesday July 31, 2019 @01:28PM (#20576378)
The original comment pointed out "entry points", so I assumed that they were talking about libraries rather than standard dead code elimination (which has been a thing for quite some time).