Re:Amazon as experiment
by mhxion on Wednesday July 31, 2019 @07:59AM
(#20573599)
From the letter:
> Within AWS, that same pattern has recurred many times. For example, we invented DynamoDB, a highly
scalable, low latency key-value database now used by thousands of AWS customers. And on the listening-
carefully-to-customers side, we heard loudly that companies felt constrained by their commercial database
options and had been unhappy with their database providers for decades – these offerings are expensive,
proprietary, have high-lock-in and punitive licensing terms. We spent several years building our own database
engine, Amazon Aurora, a fully-managed MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible service with the same or better
durability and availability as the commercial engines, but at one-tenth of the cost. We were not surprised when
this worked.
> Within AWS, that same pattern has recurred many times. For example, we invented DynamoDB, a highly scalable, low latency key-value database now used by thousands of AWS customers. And on the listening- carefully-to-customers side, we heard loudly that companies felt constrained by their commercial database options and had been unhappy with their database providers for decades – these offerings are expensive, proprietary, have high-lock-in and punitive licensing terms. We spent several years building our own database engine, Amazon Aurora, a fully-managed MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible service with the same or better durability and availability as the commercial engines, but at one-tenth of the cost. We were not surprised when this worked.