https://www.cnet.com/how-to/want-to-try-that-gender-face-swa...
I guess it looks...obviously like a filter, with particular distortion around the hair? In the BBC story's lede image [0], which purports to be two photos of the same vlogger, with and without the filter, her "filtered" face is substantially slimmed, yet the hair near the software-slimmed contours of the face looks, not fake at all?
[0] https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/123E0/production...
Also found an article [1] that looks at how much people are willing to spend and how far people are willing to go to hide their real look, things like buying silicon upper body suit(?) to get better looking boobs/frame or voice changers
[0] https://weibo.com/3824282019/HFtfQzAcw
[1] http://www.sohu.com/a/330373892_100117963 (mildly NSFW)
https://twitter.com/huizhong_wu/status/1156349675831615488
> If you watch this vid from a Chinese site it says she used to cover up her face with a cartoon photo onscreen and would post filtered photos and short vids. Think it’s that she forgot to put up the photo for the live http://n.miaopai.com/media/ffdEpeNnTdRPa4ABk8DJa-zgvC~FDYrT
Doesn't it have to be done in real time for selfie cameras to work? I'm also behind the 8-ball and somehow only recently learned of smartphones shipping with reality distortion fields on by default: https://www.insider.com/samsung-phones-default-beauty-mode-c....
I wonder if we'll hit the point of photo/video evidence being unadmissible evidence?
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8m4jYaALIA
[1] https://youtu.be/qtA0JS1lBaY?t=359