Re:The Golden Girls Would Violate Zoning Laws
by rhacker on Wednesday July 31, 2019 @11:38AM
(#20575294)
I mean we're pretty much all going to want to live as close as possible to the mountain of gold that is the jobs in those areas, poor or rich. A poorer person can more easily get a replacement job in SV than anywhere else. In fact when it was still somewhat affordable (I've moved away from SV) I've had a friend that was just a terrible employee, they couldn't hold a job - but they were NEVER unemployed, they stayed with some hotel or waitress position for about a month - got fired, hired again somewhere else before you could blink. Her husband, after living there long enough eventually got a software QA position and they finally moved up - poor to middle overnight. Mountain of gold.
Most people who moved into a neighborhood because they liked it don't want it to change. Enjoying where you live gets you labelled as a NIMBY though. It's easier to dismiss people if you give them a sweet nickname I guess.
> Sure basic economics tells us that increasing supply ought to drive down prices for everyone, but at the individual level it's tough for people to make the connection.
It should be telling that the "housing crisis" only exists in the most desirable places to live. I don't believe there is a practical amount of supply that can be built to satisfy the demand for housing in these places. The supply of upper middle class people who want to live in SV, Manhattan or San Diego is more than enough to make sure the poor can never afford it. In fact, the only people I ever see overly concerned with it are the middle class who are just on the cusp of affordability.
There's no housing crisis in Blythe.