I'm not sure why this is being downvoted because it's exactly correct from a the current legal position (as far as I understand it). An automated system can't reasonably be expected to establish, for example, whether copyright content is being used for the purposes of parody. Similarly, a copyright holder has every right to disagree with your determination of what is parody or transformative works, there aren't any simple rules to get around that.

Whether that is a sensible position for us to find ourselves in is another question.