News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Lie Detector Tests Can’t Be Trusted by taftster on Monday July 29, 2019 @12:51PM (#20556644)
Some polygraph setups will include a "butt pad" that you sit on that can detect your flinching.

I think it's interesting because it somewhat supports the claim. If clinching didn't work or help in some way, why bother including a motion detector under your backside.

Re:Why Lie Detector Tests Can’t Be Trusted by TomMckenny on Monday July 29, 2019 @01:49PM (#20557292)
Those who believe clinching works also believe polygraphs work (except when clinching)

Remove the clinching illusion and you restore the polygraph illusion to that group.

Re:Why Lie Detector Tests Can’t Be Trusted by taftster on Monday July 29, 2019 @02:27PM (#20557709)
Right. I don't honestly understand any justification for the "defenses" described (at various websites). If the polygraph just doesn't work, why attempt any "countermeasures". The whole thing is kind of funny.

I think you're exactly right. The fact that the "butt pad" is there means that you have to believe that clinching would have any effect one way or the other. So the butt pad is really just part of the overage mirage.

Re:Why Lie Detector Tests Can’t Be Trusted by saalweachter on Monday July 29, 2019 @04:07PM (#20558794)
Or imagine someone comes into take a polygraph and you search their shoes and find a tack. You can be pretty sure they came in expecting to tell some lies, and had a plan for "beating the machine".