News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube faces creator backlash by mebutnotme on Monday July 29, 2019 @12:37PM (#20556449)
YouTube are actually adding some tech to help with this. In future when making a claim you have to add the timestamps in the video where the copyright occurs. Then the creator will get that info as well as a few simple quick-fix options to cut out that portion of the video or replace it.

It's long overdue but they do seem to be making some strides to help creators at last.

Re:YouTube faces creator backlash by bobthepanda on Monday July 29, 2019 @04:22PM (#20558975)
Interesting, is there a source about these changes?
Re:YouTube faces creator backlash by jsnell on Monday July 29, 2019 @04:44PM (#20559231)
Re:YouTube faces creator backlash by kevingadd on Monday July 29, 2019 @03:40PM (#20558543)
Yes, but will it detect the claims and allow you to fix them without stealing all your revenue?
Re:YouTube faces creator backlash by anticensor on Monday July 29, 2019 @03:59PM (#20558723)
Yes, but subject to claimant's approval if you did not remove the offending sections.
Re:YouTube faces creator backlash by dvtrn on Monday July 29, 2019 @05:49PM (#20559831)
A part of me feels like claimants will find a way of gaming this and making their approval a series of endlessly nudged goalposts...given the way IP holders are already taking advantage of the tools already at their disposal.
Re:YouTube faces creator backlash by anticensor on Tuesday July 30, 2019 @04:33AM (#20563082)
No, two rounds max; both parties lose (suspect's video deleted and claimant gets a strike) it is not resolved in two rounds.
Re:YouTube faces creator backlash by dvtrn on Tuesday July 30, 2019 @10:04AM (#20564934)
So the claimant still, invariably get what they want, which is a pulled/not published video? That doesn’t sound like both parties losing to me.
Re:YouTube faces creator backlash by anticensor on Tuesday July 30, 2019 @11:10AM (#20565517)
You seem to have forgot the 3 strike rule.
Re:YouTube faces creator backlash by dvtrn on Tuesday July 30, 2019 @11:16AM (#20565605)
No I really didn’t-could do without the implication, why don’t we and leave the personal jabs about what I forgot or didn’t out of this and stick to the issue.

I don’t believe as designed that even three strikes does well at (pardon the pun) striking a balance between content creators and content ID claimants. YouTube’s own behavior, leading up to where we sit now, and the behavior of claimants gives me no reason to give either party the benefit of the doubt or faith in how they purport to be handling content claims.

I forgot nothing, friend.