Re:The human body is already close to thermal limits in many...
by Korimo on Monday July 29, 2019 @08:40AM
(#20553932)
What would be the alternative? Do smaller franchises/no-name stores have a smaller carbon footprint?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The human body is already close to thermal limits in many...
by munmaek on Monday July 29, 2019 @09:36AM
(#20554431)
The alternative is consuming less and moving away from such a consumer-heavy culture. Not merely eliminating the current big players.
Re:The human body is already close to thermal limits in many...
by war1025 on Monday July 29, 2019 @12:37PM
(#20556459)
I believe the point of "fast fashion" is that you buy new clothes more or less continuously to stay "trendy", rather than buying clothes and wearing them for several years until they're worn out.
Re:The human body is already close to thermal limits in many...
by leetcrew on Monday July 29, 2019 @09:38AM
(#20554448)
it's not about the size of the company/store. they sell clothes that won't really last more than a season or two (and will be "out of fashion" by then anyway), so people buy a new set of $10 clothes every season.
the solution is to buy higher quality clothes, but less often.